Letter: Attack on disabled

Earl Russell
Thursday 18 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: If "Blair is on a mission" (report, 15 December), he must make some theological distinctions.

He is quite right to want to reduce the social security bill, but the social security bill is not the fault of the welfare state. Social security is a demand-led budget and measures failures in the real economy. He would do more to lower the benefit bill by repairing the London Tube and by bringing down the level of the pound than by any changes in welfare he can imagine.

There are measures which social security can contribute to reducing the welfare bill and most of these the Taylor review of the poverty trap has in hand. Mr Blair must take care that in encouraging people into work he does not destroy the essential safeguard of a free market, that jobs must be made sufficiently attractive for people to want to take them. If he destroys this, he sets up a system of conscription, which in peacetime is unacceptable and unenforceable.

The one measure he has so far introduced which is likely to produce a significant reduction of the welfare bill is the national minimum wage, and on that I congratulate him.

Earl RUSSELL

Liberal Democrat Social Security Spokesman

House of Lords

London SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in