Letter: Ask China to free Aung San Suu Kyi

Mr Shway Yoe
Friday 22 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The sentiments expressed in Glenys Kinnock's open letter (19 July) to the Burmese leader, General Khin Nyunt, are laudable. The letter should, though, be addressed not to Khin Nyunt but to Burma's true master: China. So long as that nation retains an economic and strategic stranglehold on Burma, the Khin Nyunt junta will remain. Pressure should be brought on Peking, not Rangoon, for the release of Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.

Burma offers the rapidly industrialising provinces of South-west China a vital port facility in the Indian Ocean. Consequently, substantial Chinese investment in creating an effective infrastructure from border to port - in rolling stock, highway and water transport - precludes the possibility of a return to democratic rule. There are strategic implications too: the greatest Communist power in the world has a new front against the greatest democracy, India.

After bad experiences under the British and Japanese, Burma for 30 years pursued a non-aligned stance at the expense of one-time national prosperity. The irony is that it has been colonised again.

Yours sincerely,

SHWAY YOE

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in