LETTER:Art and the human condition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Catherine Wilkinson
Sir: Following Marianne Macdonald's article ("Q: which photo shows a work of conceptual art and which a jumble sale?", 25 March) which reports my comment that the question "is it art?" is of little relevance, may I be allowed to explain why.
After being done to death in various arenas, "is it art?" tends to obscure the possibility of discussing the effect of what is actually there. The piles of second-hand clothes in the north gallery of the Serpentine are on the verge of becoming abject: they are without owner and therefore without function. Only the actions of the arriving visitors allows them the chance of resuscitation and re-animation.
There is space for a wariness or even repulsion for these discarded clothes with unknown histories, as well as the attraction of being able to claim possession of them. They remain evidence of the absent human content. There is a potential sense of despair in realising the practical impossibility of sifting through everything, the lost opportunity of not being present in the gallery throughout the work's duration, a point at which the desire to take more requires examination.
I may not agree that it is the "ultimate gesture" which Julia Peyton- Jones suggests, but it is one of many possible significant gestures, here allowing the contents of the gallery to be dispersed outwards. In this respect it could be art about the condition of art, opposing a singular, unaffordable status, but it is also undeniably evocative of the human condition, through its material, its reliance on audience, and a notion of dispersal which parallels the grouping dispersal of peoples or ideas from a central geographic, intellectual, emotional or political moment.
It may be that the art student turnout reflects not only their poverty, but their interest in their subject; I am sure the Serpentine is more than used to a significant student attendance at the opening of any show.
Yours sincerely,
CATHERINE WILKINSON,
London, SW11
26 March
The writer is a student at the Chelsea School of Art.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments