Letter: Armed police for London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Although the open arming of the police appears to be a new development (report, 17 May), it was in fact routine for Metropolitan police on night patrol to carry pistols until the mid-1930s, and most people today would like to feel that the police are in a position to act effectively in a violent situation.
However, it is known that the sight of a weapon can increase a mood of violence in any serious encounter, and an openly worn sidearm is very easy to take from a policeman who suffers a surprise attack - hence the observation that arms do not appear to add materially to police safety in some settings. An alternative is possible, that of arming most police with a slim self-loading pistol worn within a tunic designed for swift access.
With regard to the use of chemical sprays, these are prohibited weapons in the UK; this is perhaps a legacy of a social memory of their use during the First World War. Perhaps now would be the time to acknowledge their value as a means of subduing assailants who are under the influence of drink or drugs, although the use of these unergonomic aerosols against an alert and agile opponent is somewhat dubious.
Yours sincerely,
D. EADSFORTH
Winchester
17 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments