Letter: Arfur's wicked life sentence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I DID not say, as Colin Tudge alleges ('But what was it like for the lion?', 17 January), that the incident with the lion at London Zoo showed the 'folly' of keeping wild animals in captivity. I said it demonstrated the wickedness of keeping them there for public show, and his article, assuring us that the progeny of the London lions will soon be 'distributed among several leading zoos', displays the apparently unbridgeable gulf between people like him and people like me: those who assume that animals exist for human beings, and those who believe that in the eye of God and of nature they are our equals.
Unless we keep such animals in zoos, Mr Tudge concludes, 'we will lose them'. If a tribe of Brazilian Indians were near extinction, would he advocate keeping some of them in prison too, exhibited to public view, lest the world become less interesting for us?
Jan Morris
Llanystumdwy, Gwynedd
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments