LETTER: Are banks money shops or business partners?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Stanley Best
Sir: Your balanced and sensible leading article ("Bank rage hits Oxfordshire", 5 September) does not go far enough. Had Julia Verity and Richard Spindler taken the advice of a solicitor before embarking on their venture, rather than relying on the bank, it is likely that they would not now be in their present predicament.
I hope that the courts will go further in bringing banks to book. Three years ago I argued, as counsel for a bank customer who had entered into a disastrous business venture, that given the knowledge that the bank had as to the creditworthiness of her partner in that venture - also a customer of the same bank - the bank had a duty to advise my client to get independent advice before borrowing from the bank to finance the joint enterprise. The Court of Appeal disagreed with me, holding that when my client entered the bank it was up to her to look after herself.
A solicitor would have discovered the true position, which the bank - bound by a duty of confidentiality to its other customer - could not reveal to my client. In fact, of course, she had no suspicion of the true position and so believed herself adequately protected by the willingness of the bank to provide finance.
Yours faithfully,
Stanley Best
Guildhall Chambers
Portsmouth, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments