Letter:Answering German question
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Andrew Marr thinks further European integration is too difficult and we had better come to terms with the status quo in a Europe that will inevitably be dominated by Germany ("Don't fudge it: the European question is Germany", 7 March).
That proposition is not acceptable either to most of our EU partners or to Germany's eastern neighbours. Above all it is not desired by Germany herself. For them, in a politically united Europe of 370 million, rising to 475 million within 20 years, a Germany of 80 million inhabitants will no doubt be important and influential but certainly not dominant.
This has always been one of the principal motives for European integration ever since the creation of the European Coal and steel Community in the 1950s. Difficult though the process has been, we are well on the way to an economic, monetary and political union, which has always been a clear objective for most EU members and Germany in particular. None of them wants a superstate, but they favour a union in which member states retain their national identities and autonomy for all matters that are not agreed in common.
Wishful thinking that they might fail or that Britain can stop them will merely repeat the costly errors of the past, when we chose not to join at the start.
Ernest Wistrich
London NW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments