Letter: Angling in the same league as hunting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read with disbelief James Barrington's letter (31 December) in which he contrasts foxhunting and fishing. He argues that the League Against Cruel Sports does not campaign against angling, because most fish which are caught are either eaten or returned to the water. Does this mean that the league would stop campaigning against foxhunting if the victims were turned into stew afterwards?
Both foxhunting and angling are wrong because both involve a high degree of cruelty to animals. Angling is certainly cruel; to inflict pain and terror on a fish for sport seems to me just as cruel as to inflict it on a fox, and the fact that the fish is eaten afterwards in no way makes its death acceptable, any more than it would if abattoir cattle were tortured to death first. Fish have highly developed nervous systems and are easily stressed; for every fish reported to have been caught several times in a season, many less hardy ones would have died from the ordeal several days later.
The real reason organisations such as the League Against Cruel Sports do not campaign against fishing is that so many people enjoy angling; it would be too unpopular politically.
By all means we should campaign against foxhunting - but let's not forget that cruelty is cruelty regardless of its popularity.
Yours faithfully,
PATRICIA BELTON
Enfield, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments