Letter: An open mind on the modern home
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As an owner of a 1932 listed building modern house, I cannot agree with Alan Powers, secretary of the Twentieth Century Society, and James Dunnett, architect and spokesman for Docomomo, quoted by Jonathan Glancey in 'One good functionalist deserves another' (10 February). A modern house is not, as they say, 'a fine work of art that cannot be changed in any way without destroying its integrity'. If this is their principle for measuring the satisfactory conservation of modern houses then, sadly, these organisations are into the business of embalming, not conserving, them.
These homes are not closed, but excitingly open, aesthetic-cum- functional systems that depend on their dwellers interacting by developing appropriate interests over time to incorporate into the experience of their light, space and structure which function multi-dimensionally. As the lived perceptual experience of possible functional alternatives is part of their architects' conception of them, Sir Norman Foster's plans for 64 Old Church Street do not depart from, but rather fulfil, Erich Mendelsohn's intentions for the house.
Yours sincerely,
SUSAN WILSMORE
London, WC1
13 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments