Letter: An education for our time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I can see no justification for the claim by Howard Davies that the national curriculum has largely been a success ('When will they ever learn?', 18 January). In his next sentence he says: 'Most schools and colleges welcome the control they have been given over their own affairs.' The national curriculum is widely criticised for being over-prescriptive: teachers now have less freedom to decide how they teach. Meanwhile, large numbers of schools are bracing themselves for next year's budget cut. Is that autonomy?
Mr Davies writes as a senior industrialist and it is understandable that he sees education in terms of developing skills for jobs. But schools have a wider brief than that. What kind of education should be offered to those who face a life of under- or unemployment? What kind of education do we need to meet the growing social problems of a society changing too rapidly for traditional structures to hold? How many of today's job skills will be appropriate in 15 years' time, I wonder - when current school-leavers will be scarcely in their thirties?
Educational re-forming is a continuing need, not a once-and-for- all decision, whatever government rhetoric may imply. Mr Davies does not help schools to meet the needs of industry by propagating a simplistic picture of how we might educate the next generation.
Yours faithfully,
PETER POOL
Shipley, West Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments