Letter : A-level triumphs no surprise

Margaret Eposton
Sunday 18 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Amid all the public discussion about this year's A-levels, I do not recall any reference to the fact that those candidates from state schools were the first to cover a National Curriculum in English, Mathematics and Science - first to be tested at 14, then in new GCSEs and now in new A-Levels. (Independent schools are not required to follow the NC nor sit Key Stage tests at 14.).Wouldn't an improvement in all grades at A-level be therefore hoped for as a measure of the NC's success? Now that an improvement has happened, should we not be celebrating it?

In mathematics, the new A-level courses assume competence at National Curriculum level 7 (approximately C grade GCSE), whereas many entrants embarked on the course with Higher Tier awards at A* (=level 10) or A (=level 9). They clearly had a head start on their A-level work, with some topics being tested again in their A-level papers.

The new GCSE that my students tackled in 1994 contained questions as hard as in the O-level that I taught for nearly 20 years - in fact I used past O-level questions in their preparation. Their competence showed in their progress through the new A-level syllabus. If most had not then achieved very good A-level results on this new syllabus, I would have been looking for the reasons.

MARGARET E POSTON

London N12

The writer is head of mathematics at a north London grammar school.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in