Letter: Advertising of tobacco products
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nicholas Timmins's article 'Tobacco adverts 'too near schools' ' (7 March) correctly points out that responsibility for compliance with the voluntary restrictions on tobacco advertising on posters near schools rests with the tobacco manufacturers. Tobacco companies are required by the agreements not to purchase poster space that they know to be covered by the restrictions.
Yet the Tobacco Manufacturers Association (TMA) is quoted in the article as blaming 'poster companies' for placing such adverts in defiance of the restrictions 'without thinking properly'. The TMA should not be permitted to wriggle out of its responsibilities so easily.
Despite not having been party to the restrictions, and having no formal role in their enforcement, the Outdoor Advertising Association (OAA), which represents the majority of the owners of outdoor billboard sites and all the major firms in the industry, takes its responsibilities in this matter very seriously. The OAA would take action to discipline any of its member companies found to have breached this voluntary code by agreeing to let a site that it knew to be covered by the agreement for tobacco advertising.
The real question is, why are the tobacco companies continuing to buy these spaces in violation of their voluntary agreement with the Government?
Yours sincerely,
ROGER FERNLEY
Chairman
Outdoor Advertising Association
London, W1
7 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments