Letter: Advantages of universal benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee's unease over universal benefits is understandable but misplaced. Universal benefits are popular, cheap to administer, without stigma, do not create poverty or unemployment traps, are reliable forms of income, and are taken back from those who don't need them through the tax system.
On the other hand, means-tested benefits are unpopular, expensive to administer, carry a substantial stigma, create poverty and unemployment traps, and are unreliable as people's circumstances change.
To increase the coverage of universal benefits would be good for enterprise, good for the economy and good for individual liberty, and the money spent would be well targeted.
Yours faithfully,
MALCOLM TORRY
Citizens Income Study Centre
London, WC2
21 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments