Letter: Adoption sanctions vital for children
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article 'Adoption is no crime' (20 October) misrepresents the proposals in the Adoption Law Review for safeguarding the welfare of children brought into this country for adoption.
It is true that the report proposes that there should be a sanction against those who circumvent the proper procedures, and that it should be possible for a court, on the application of a local authority, to order the removal of a child in such circumstances. As the report says, the procedures designed to safeguard children cannot be regarded as optional, and it follows that there must be a possibility of a sanction.
Children are entitled to the best possible safeguards, and while the majority of those wishing to adopt a child from abroad may be able to offer a safe and secure home, and may have the best of motives, there is a need to ensure that those who do not fit into this category know that they will face sanctions if they attempt to avoid the proper procedures.
Since a court considering removing a child would be obliged to regard the child's welfare as the paramount consideration, it is hardly to be envisaged that the court would make an order that would jeopardise the child's well- being.
Yours faithfully
DEBORAH CULLEN
Legal Adviser
British Agencies for
Adoption & Fostering
London, SE1
21 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments