Letter: Action now to keep the elderly warm
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article "Dickensian season for the elderly" (24 December) makes grim reading; nevertheless its message about the consequences of a large section of UK houses being unheatable is an understatement. Not only the old suffer. Everyone, especially children, is susceptible to cold-induced winter illness, and since cold houses result in condensation with consequent mould growth, also to damp-induced illness such as asthma.
The investment required to raise the UK housing stock to the thermal standards equivalent to those of our north European neighbours is massive. However, spread over, say, 10 years it is still less than the aggregated costs of death, illness (including consequent educational and production losses), damage to houses and their contents, the (ludicrously inadequate) cold weather payments, and the extra costs to social services and housing management.
The variations in UK winter climate are striking, if temperature, wind and sunshine (or lack of it) are all taken into account. A house in the Shetlands consumes 69 per cent more energy than an identical house heated to identical temperatures in London. Bad as conditions are everywhere in the UK, the hardship and loss is unevenly distributed.
Hence the investment needed to make life safe, healthy and tolerable for the eight million households who currently cannot meet such heating criteria, will need to be regionally targeted.
THOMAS A MARKUS
Emeritus Professor of Building Science
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
(The writer was co-author of Watt Committee Report 30 "Domestic Energy and Affordable Warmth", 1994)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments