Letter: Abortion rights must be constantly defended

Ms Jean Ames
Wednesday 23 June 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Those of us who are pro-choice and pro-human rights need to be clear about our support for a Bill of Rights.

Barbara Hewson (Letters, 23 June) puts the case against Supreme Courts ultimately deciding these matters. An equally strong case, however, can be made against the consistent attempts of Parliament to undermine abortion rights over the years.

The truth of the matter is that abortion rights will need to be defended vigilantly and eternally, whatever the system, and no one should pretend otherwise. There is no legal or political fix available on such issues.

A Bill of Rights is no panacea, and its advocates do not put it forward as such - its advantage is to create a formal and accessible structure in which the serious moral and philosophical battles can be fought in the open.

One only needs to study recent rape cases to realise that we certainly need better, more representative judges and better judicial training alongside any rights legislation. However, a society more aware of its rights and its means

of redress provides a better - though not complete - defence against reaction than one which entrusts its fate wholly to the

whim of the governing majority of the day.

Yours etc,

JEAN AMES

London, NW6

23 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in