LETTER: A worse scramble for college places

Mr Barrie Behenna
Monday 28 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Barrie Behenna

Sir: You refer to the debate ("New college entry system would end scramble for places", 23 August), which has been continuing warmly for some months now, about a possible replacement for the current system of university and college admissions, operated by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service, and anticipate the debate by the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals next month.

May I sound a note of warning? So far from reducing the intensity of the scramble for places through the current clearing system, a new procedure which requires all applicants to defer action until their results are known will surely lead to even greater confusion, uncertainty and stress, apart from the impossibility, which you mention, of interviewing candidates. This would, of course, be alleviated if the academic year began in January, not September/October, but it does not, and there is no enthusiasm for change.

There are many with extensive experience of operating the current system who believe that with a modicum of review it would operate entirely satisfactorily for the vast majority of applicants. If it ain't bust, don't fix it.

Yours faithfully,

Barrie Behenna

Academic Secretary

University of Exeter

Exeter

23 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in