Letter: A mythical tale fit for a queen

Ms E. M. Karbacz
Tuesday 25 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Please do not keep perpetrating the myth that it's all due to Queen Victoria that there is no mention of lesbians in British law. ('Face to face in the homosexual debate', 20 January: 'Queen Victoria didn't think women could do that to each other, so there's no mention of lesbians in the law.')

The Criminal Law Amendment Bill of 1885, section 2 (Outrages on Public Decency), dealt with 'male persons' only. There was never any question of it being applied to lesbians, so the silly story that Queen Victoria had it altered is completely mythical. (If she had done so, it would have had to come back to the House, and Hansard would have recorded it.)

When did this tall tale start? I never heard of it before the Second World War, and I would guess that it was invented soon after that - when homosexual rights were first beginning to be discussed. It was probably intended as a joke.

Yours faithfully,

ELSIE KARBACZ

West Mersea,

Essex

22 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in