Letter: A long life in Victorian times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A long life in Victorian times
Sir: David Miles ("As people live longer let them work longer", 18 August) uses the fact that in 1847 male life expectancy at birth was only 41 years to deduce that "the average boy" would have a working life of 30 years from age 11 to death.
I have no idea what life expectancy was then at age 10, 20 or 30, but high infant and childhood mortality were in a large part responsible for the low average life expectancy at birth.
Life expectancy at birth tells you very little about the typical age of death, especially for those who made it into their teens. David Miles is in danger of perpetuating the myth that in past centuries society was full of ancient 30-year-olds waiting for death.
TERRY MARSHALL
Norwich
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments