Letter: A government that Londoners can call their own
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The report by the Institute for Metropolitan Studies (6 July) is a welcome contribution to the debate on the government of London. But the debate has moved beyond 'whether or not to revive the elephantine GLC'. Discussion about a new authority for London has centred around proposals such as that of the Labour Party before the general election for a streamlined authority with a small secretariat and membership. Labour also proposed proportional representation to achieve a more consensual make-up.
The Government's plans are twofold. Neither meets the challenge presented by serious students of London, such as the academic authors of this new report. The Government has a secretive ministerial subcommittee, whose final decisions (if any) will be all that enter the public domain. There will also be a forum of a dozen business people with a brief of promoting the capital.
The subcommittee may have power but little accountability. The forum's purpose is purely promotional. I cannot see how businesses can attract inward investment when they have no control over planning applications, relevant training and appropriate housing opportunities.
Meanwhile, we can already see the consequences of there being no London government. The European Central Bank seems set for Bonn, following the Government's half-hearted embrace of London's case; and County Hall, an eminently suitable home for the London School of Economics, has been left unused or half- empty for six years, facing the prospect of becoming yet another hotel complex.
London's transport, strategic planning and environment need to be developed coherently. We need to promote our city in Europe. But to do these things we need a real elected voice, as Londoners have said whenever they are asked about the subject. I hope John Major treats what the IMS and others are saying with the seriousness they deserve.
Yours faithfully,
MARGARET HODGE
Chair
Association of
London Authorities
London, SW1
6 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments