Letter: A French lesson in heritage funding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Stephen Dorrell, the Heritage Secretary, in a briefing before last Friday's keynote speech in Nottingham ('Dorrell sees tourism as source of arts funding', leading article, 7 October), asked why British people 'go for exciting weekends in Paris' rather than tourists coming here.
Surely France attracts tourists because it has sufficient state funding to embark on important heritage projects of great international interest.
Take, for example, the Musee d'Orsay in Paris, recently converted from a railway station into an art gallery at the government's expense.
This is in stark contrast to Mr Dorrell's policy for Britain to be dependent on using the power of the market to get more money into heritage, and his claim at the conference that his department is 'not a money fountain'.
What is also disturbing is that the expertise in our museums appears to be in danger of diminishing since the Government's policy is to offer curators only two- year contracts; a number in the profession may well decide to seek positions in the United States, which offers them greater security.
This would leave our institutions in the hands of managers and marketing men, but perhaps that is the hidden agenda.
Yours faithfully,
GEORGE J. LEVY
London, W1
10 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments