LETTER: A flawed disabled Bill is better than nothing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AN PARKER quotes Rachel Hurst as implying that I do not believe in civil rights for disabled people ("Spitting on charity", Sunday Review, 9 April). Nothing could be further from the truth. In a paper published last year by the Commission on Social Justice, "Disabled People and Social Justice", I called for all the things the disability movement seeks in comprehensive civil rights legislation.
Ian Parker quotes me as saying that the Government's Disability Discrimination Bill had some merit but not why I hold this view. Let me explain. Given the choice, the Royal Association for Disability and Rehabilitation (Radar) would prefer to see Harry Barnes' Private Member's Bill enacted, but the Government has made it clear that it has no intention of allowing this Bill to become law and has an arsenal of weapons to ensure that it fails. We would, therefore, be left with the government Bill or no Bill.
If we had no Bill there is no guarantee we would get a Bill through Parliament next year. If a Labour government is elected there is no guarantee that civil rights legislation, while part of party policy, will be the highest priority. We could wait two or three years for a Bill, during which time disabled people would continue to experience forms of discrimination which even the government Bill will help prevent.
As introduced, the Government's Bill was extremely flawed. It remains flawed, but the Government responded to representation and has made a number of changes. I believe further improvements can be obtained when the Bill reaches the House of Lords.
Bert Massie
Director, Radar
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments