Letter: A duty to speak on the victim's behalf

Mr Montague Phillips
Monday 05 April 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Professor Prins in his letter (31 March) criticises what he perceives to be an increasing tendency for senior police officers to comment upon sentences imposed by the courts.

When I joined the police service in the late Fifties we were taught that our role was to investigate offences and place offenders before the courts. At this stage our involvement ceased. This philosophy was fully accepted in the service at that time and in the following years because we had every confidence in the judicial system and in the manner in which it was administered.

However, it is not surprising in the present climate that senior police officers feel it their duty to comment on sentences being passed by the courts. Motorists are being fined pounds 500 for parking offences while serious offences against the person, including indecency, are being dealt with by means of non-custodial sentences, eg conditional discharge or community service. This is not always the fault of the judiciary but is often the result of misguided legislation introduced by Parliament.

There is an increasing need for someone to speak on behalf of the victim. It appears that at the moment the police service is the only agency that is prepared to undertake this task. Thus the service is unfortunately having to fulfil a need that should not be within its remit.

Yours faithfully,

MONTAGUE PHILLIPS

Wythall, Worcestershire

31 March

The writer was Acting Assistant Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police (1988-89).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in