Letter: A doctor's duty and a patient's right to die
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your point on the case of Dr Cox (leading article, 21 December) that many terminally ill patients reach a stage where well-informed consent to euthanasia is impossible is well taken. But it provides an argument not against legalising euthanasia, but in favour of legislation permitting patients whose decision-making faculties are unimpaired to take control of their own deaths, perhaps in the form of 'living wills'.
Such legislation would also make less likely the sentencing of those doctors who, like Nigel Cox, do - in the face of our present law - what is in the circumstances the only decent thing to do.
Yours faithfully,
ROGER CRISP
Fellow in Philosophy
St Anne's College
Oxford
22 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments