Letter: A controversial chromosome
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: If gay genes exist, there is an interesting consequence ('Homosexuality linked to genes'). Other things being equal, a gene that vastly reduces the chance of propagating itself through reproduction will in the course of time gradually disappear.
So other things are clearly not equal, and one is forced to conclude that the secondary effects of possessing this new gene, either to those gays who do have children, or to the society (or gene-pool) of which they form a part, are so beneficial that they balance the obvious reproductive disadvantage.
Yours sincerely,
R. H. S. CARPENTER
Lecturer in Physiology
Cambridge University
16 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments