Letter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The problems of conservation and eco-tourism (report, 15 September) arise because of Western definitions of conservation which presume the separation of humans from nature.
The image of exotic expanses of African wilderness without human inhabitants is a myth created by Western conservationists. Protected areas in Africa often entail the forceful eviction of the indigenous population without provision for alternative livlihoods. In this context, why shouldn't conservation be redefined as "the sustainable use of natural resources by local communities"?
Your article is right; conservation is a legacy of colonialism. It is easy for us in the West to advocate protected areas, since it is never us who are thrown out of our homes. And it is as tourists that we enjoy the majority of the benefits. No wonder tourist companies put so much money into conservation, very little of which gets to those who have suffered because of it.
MIKE SANSOM
Bristol
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments