Letter: 101 uses for a palace

Lady Graham
Wednesday 10 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The recent suggestion that the Queen should vacate Buckingham Palace, to enable the building to be put to another use, is not new.

In the mid-1860s the National Gallery was bitterly criticised - The Builder, for instance, called it 'the ugliest and most ill-constructed picture gallery in Europe' - and one suggested solution was that the present Queen's great-great-grandmother should move from Buckingham Palace to Kensington Palace, and that the National Gallery's collection should fill the vacancy.

In words attributed to King Solomon, 'There is nothing new, but what has once been old.'

Yours faithfully,

HALINA GRAHAM

Curator

The Cecil Higgins

Art Gallery

Bedford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in