Leading Article: Yeltsin's hollow victory

Thursday 19 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

At last Boris Yeltsin has a victory of sorts to crow over. Yesterday he finally asserted his authority and that of Moscow by capturing the presidential palace in the Chechen capital, Grozny. But the price of this partial and symbolic victory has b een the Russian president's loss of legitimacy. Until now his real power has lain in his claim to be the only democratically elected president in his country's history. But in picking a fight with this obscure republic of mavericks and then pursuing it w ith such violence, he has sacrificed his claim to the support of democrats and liberals everywhere. Next year he may face the prospect of running for re-election and losing, not running, or abandoning the election altogether.

Against these historic implications the outcome of the continuing attrition in Chechnya may seem of less importance. A guerrilla war will rumble on; the Afghans managed a successful 11-year campaign against a much more united Russia. Many of the Chechen fighters are Afghantsi - Red Army veterans of that war - and have learnt the lessons of those battles. Chechnya is probably too small a country to support similar resistance: only half the terrain is really suitable for guerrilla operations. But the rebels may enjoy clandestine support from neighbouring Muslim republics within Russia. Indeed Chechen generals have this week been hosting press conferences in Ingushetia, supposedly still part of Russia. We can expect armed opposition to the Russians to last a very long time.

This resistance will prove to be a constant irritation to a body politic now inflamed by dispute and failure. Far from emerging from the flames of civil strife enhanced and strengthened, Boris Yeltsin has been severely weakened. The conflict has revealedthe incompetence of Russian commanders, the demoralised state of Russia's conscript soldiers and the disunity of purpose that afflicts the government in Moscow.

President Yeltsin has parted company with Russia's reformers, his natural allies, and now seems increasingly to be the prisoner of authoritarian elements in the Kremlin and the military.

The problem for all those who wish the new Russia well is that the Chechen adventure has strengthened the authoritarian forces and weakened the democrats. In this context, President Yeltsin might seem the best bet. This may well be why Douglas Hurd's speech last night about the Chechen situation was so muted in its criticisms of the Russian president. Privately, Foreign Office officials were admitting that, for the moment, the best policy is to try to coax Mr Yeltsin back on to the democratic path. We can only hope they are right.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in