Leading Article: Writing on the wall for boarding schools

Tuesday 26 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AT FIRST sight, the decline in pupil numbers at independent schools reported on today's news pages is a vindication of government policy. It is evidence that parents, few of whom have any instinctive enthusiasm for private education per se, now recognise the success of Tory education reforms in the public sector. Better state schools make it less necessary for parents to spend horrifying sums on educating their children privately. Hence the fall in demand for private schooling.

But this is only a small part of the story. A more important reason for the continuing decline in the demand for private education is simply its price. Until the end of the Eighties, most bursars of independent schools assumed that parents would continue to educate their children privately no matter what the cost. Average fees might rise 30 per cent in three years; parents would simply tighten their belts, take fewer holidays, or sell their houses in France. Only as a last resort would they send their children to a comprehensive.

The recession of 1990, and the drop in middle-class disposable incomes it caused, has shattered that assumption. But more important than falling incomes, perhaps, was the unprecedented financial uncertainty that the recession brought to those in highly-paid jobs. Some parents who could afford to educate their children privately did not do so, for fear of the disruption that might result if they were unable to pay next year's fees.

Some of the drop in independent school rolls is the result of a separate trend: the decline of the English boarding school. Sending children away to be educated is clearly going out of fashion. English boarding schools may remain popular among foreigners and the diminishing number of senior British diplomats and soldiers stationed abroad; but for London families, the brutal adolescent rituals of boarding school have become an anachronism as well as an extravagance.

Private schools with an eye to the future should therefore see the current recession as a shot across their bows. Some will now wonder whether their building programmes during the Eighties were ill-judged. Others will concentrate on the most alarming statistic reported by the independent schools yesterday: the huge increase, to 27 per cent, in the proportion of pupils whose parents receive help with fees. Bursaries and other forms of discreet discounting may help smooth the cycle of the education market. But when one in four parents cannot afford the bills, the message is clear: private schooling has become too expensive.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in