Leading Article: Time for Unionist leaders to move
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UNIONIST condemnation of Saturday night's murders at the Rising Sun pub in Greysteel is not enough. The Rev Ian Paisley rightly called the killings a 'diabolical atrocity', but Unionist politicians were slow last week to throw their full authority against such reprisals. Their task now is to meet with the loyalist paramilitaries and try to dissuade them from violence. Dr Paisley and James Molyneaux, the Ulster Unionist leader, do have influence. They must do whatever they can to stop those who employ force of arms in the Unionist cause.
John Hume's lonely but courageous attempts to convert Sinn Fein to peaceful methods provides an example. As in Mr Hume's case, tackling the paramilitaries would be politically risky. Northern Ireland's history is littered with Unionist leaders whose careers were destroyed after they identified themselves with moderation: Terence O'Neill, Brian Faulkner and Bill Craig spring to mind. Dr Paisley's success shows that extremism is rarely a vote-loser.
Unionism, like nationalism, has long flirted with violence. Sir Edward Carson used the threat of rebellion by the 'Ulster Volunteers' to stall the introduction of Irish Home Rule in 1914. Loyalist paramilitaries helped to organise the strike that destroyed power-sharing in Northern Ireland in 1974.
But now the politics of Northern Ireland are in flux. Unionist politicians must be prepared to lead their people into new ways of approaching old problems. This means not only isolating violent loyalists but pressing the Protestant community to rethink its place in Ireland. Slogans such as 'No surrender' cease to be credible when others show signs of compromise. Sinn Fein may be bluffing about making compromises but the Republic's government has moved considerably to acknowledge that the Unionists have a veto on fundamental change.
So far Unionists have not moved; they have tried only to frustrate initiatives. They know that John Major's government is beholden to them for parliamentary support and cannot force a settlement. But at some stage there will be a stronger Westminster government. If the IRA disavowed violence the British public would quickly tire of Unionist inertia, not to mention loyalist violence. Demographic trends, reducing the Protestant majority in Northern Ireland, suggest that time is running out for intransigence.
Unionist leaders are, in their short-termism, missing an historic opportunity to protect the interests of their people. Like nationalists, they must tackle the paramilitaries and offer realistic alternatives to the killing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments