Leading Article: The need to encourage the whistle-blowers

Sunday 03 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LOYALTY is not a simple concept. If you believe that your boss is corrupt, your company negligent or your government untruthful, true loyalty may involve a technical act of betrayal. Loyalties to people, principles and institutions often clash. Yet the whistle-blower, no matter how honourable his or her intentions, or how vindicated by results, is often treated like the schoolchild who sneaks to teacher. Many human tragedies ensue, and many abuses remain unreported.

Public Concern at Work is a charity set up last year to provide legal advice to whistle-blowers. In its first six months, according to its report published today, 260 people sought legal advice, of whom 70 per cent were concerned about serious illegality or dangers in the workplace. They came equally from the public and private sectors, and 12 per cent from the voluntary sector.

The report makes melancholy reading, with its cases of loyal employees victimised for reporting abuses that may be costing the firm money or endangering lives. Many managers, it says, go for the messenger rather than dealing with the message. 'The prevailing culture in many organisations in the UK,' it laments, 'is that staff should mind their own business, come what may.' The report contrasts practice in the United States, where some leading companies now reward their staff for reporting financial malpractice. Even there, however, there have been many cases of whistle-blowers being victimised, going bankrupt and attempting suicide - and of others who have delayed reporting fraud in order to maximise their reward.

Punishing the messenger has always been a shortsighted reaction to bad news. Enlightened institutions need a balance between the healthy group loyalties that are necessary to any organisation, and the checks and balances which ensure that these do not protect corrupt or negligent members. They also need procedures for weeding out malicious cranks who are bound to exploit complaints procedures.

In its short life, Public Concern at Work has done valuable work in helping individuals and raising awareness of the problem. Broader change will not come until more companies and institutions come to see that it is in their own interest to encourage staff to report abuses. Many well-known scandals and disasters could have been avoided if that had been better understood.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in