Leading Article: The logic of Austria voting 'Ja'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MUCH hangs on Sunday's referendum in Austria on membership of the European Union. Terms judged favourable by the political establishment have been negotiated. It is now for the people to give their verdict. The latest poll suggests that a comfortable majority will say yes, but earlier soundings indicated a much closer result.
Of the four countries whose governments hope to join the EU next January, Austria is the first to stage its referendum. Sweden, Finland and Norway follow, by arrangement, in descending order of presumed enthusiasm. If the Austrians say no, the Scandinavians are more likely to do likewise. Should the first three vote yes, even the ultra- hesitant Norwegians may do so, too.
As usual in such debates, each side has been seeking to scare voters with horror stories about the consequences of ignoring their advice. Austria's post-Second World War tradition of neutrality has been at the centre of the debate. When the Soviet Union and the Allies withdrew their troops in 1955, the Russians made Austria promise to stay neutral for ever. Under successive chancellors, notably Bruno Kreisky, Austria presented itself as a neutral pivot between the superpowers, hospitable to refugees and ever ready to use its various special relationships for the common good. That disappeared when the Berlin Wall came down - and with it the logic of being neutral. Refugees poured in, fuelling latent xenophobia. Freed in 1992 of the odium attaching to its durable President, Kurt Waldheim, Austria needed to redefine its role. Joining the EU looks like the logical answer. With its backing, the old capital of the Austro-Hungarian empire could once more play a key role in relations between Western and Central Europe. Staying out could result in being overtaken politically by the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Poland when they join.
An interesting question is whether, if Austria joins, it will see its interests best served by aligning with Germany - or with other small powers. A side-effect would be to establish German, far less used than English and French, as the language spoken by much the largest number of EU citizens.
Another certainty is that Austria's currently low international profile would be substantially raised. A parallel can be drawn with Ireland, which has gained enormously in political self-confidence from membership. Should Austrians vote for membership, their country will be joining the big league. At last Austrians will be able to shed their feeling of being the perennial victims of forces beyond their control.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments