LEADING ARTICLE : The Flick fiasco
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The University of Oxford is a world-class educational institution. At its best it is a civilised and civilising place. But sometimes it behaves stupidly. That is the only judgement to be made of its mishandling of the Flick endowment to pay for a chair in European thought. The affair has exposed Oxford's creaking bureaucracy, which operated in this case with little logic and less consistency.
It has never been easy to spot the strict tests Oxford has applied to its donors. The Rhodes scholarships, which are a central feature of Oxford life, are founded upon the fortune Cecil Rhodes made in southern Africa by methods no well-meaning liberal would endorse. Oxford's fund-raising campaign in America took money from all quarters.
The opponents of the Flick endowment say none of that counts because this case is different. Dr Gert-Rudolf Flick's grandfather was a Nazi war criminal who made a fortune exploiting slave labour during the Second World War. Oxford might have rejected it but it took the money. Once criticism emerged, it might have defended the endowment by arguing that the origins of the money mattered far less than what was done with it. Instead Oxford delayed and wrung its hands. Dr Flick has decided to take his pounds 350,000 elsewhere.
It is Oxford's loss. The university emerges from the affair with no credit. The vice-chancellor, Peter North, is leading an inquiry into the way the university is run. The Flick affair should tell him just how urgent reform is.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments