Leading Article: Profitable BT is leading the way

Tuesday 08 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TAKE the third-quarter profits that BT announces tomorrow, divide by 7.949 million, and the result - the amount that the British telephone company made every second - will undoubtedly be large. Yet high profits are not proof that British telephone subscribers are being maltreated. On the contrary, the lot of BT customers is improving.

Praise must be split three ways. Customers should first thank that much-abused pair, privatisation and regulation. When BT was sold off, the Government avoided the disastrous mistake of levying a special tax on its profits. To do so would have given BT management no incentive to improve. The chosen method of capping prices - this year to 7.5 per cent below the retail price index - has resulted in real telephone prices being 26 per cent lower today than in 1984.

Technological advances are also partly responsible for BT's transformation. Thanks to the installation of fibre-optic cables under British roads and new computers in BT offices, the cost of running the telephone system has fallen sharply since the mid-Eighties. This helps to explain why telephone prices to the consumer have fallen while the charges of other public utilities have remained static or risen. As the computing and telecommunications revolution rolls on, the scope for cheaper telephone calls will increase. The potential for price cuts from the other utilities may be less, but is still there.

It would be churlish not to give BT itself some credit. Operators are more polite. Directory inquiries, although no longer free, are answered promptly and efficiently. A new phone line can be installed in days rather than months. Moreover, BT has begun to behave like a business rather than a branch of the Civil Service. It made a virtue of necessity by spending heavily to advertise the last round of price cuts forced on it by Oftel. Its abolition yesterday of the irritating peak-rate morning pricing was a direct response to research into customer needs.

There is still a long way to go. Other telephone companies, such as Mercury, rightly complain that they pay too much for access to BT's local networks. Most long-distance calls are not automatically routed via the cheapest company, as they should be. Three cheers, therefore, may be going a little too far. Say three cheers minus 7.5 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in