Leading Article: Party of cut-price family values
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UNIVERSAL Challenge, your starter for 10, no conferring: who said on Thursday in Brussels that the profitability of a company was more important than the family life of its employees? Bzzzz] Yes, that's right, Michael Portillo, the Employment Secretary. First bonus question: Who said in June that business was contributing to the break up of families by forcing employees to spend 'outrageous' hours at work away from their children? Yes, that's right, Alistair Burt, the Social Security minister. Second bonus question: Isn't the Conservative Party The Party Of The Family? Well, yes, there certainly was a time when that was thought to be the case. There was a time, too, when the goal of a civilised society was thought to be the organisation of work so that people had more time to spend with their families, books, dog or golf ball, a belief that work was a means rather than an end. But then Margaret Thatcher disinvented society and everyone became confused.
Mr Portillo's remarks came as he vetoed the European Union scheme to allow three months unpaid paternity leave. Asked if he would be more concerned with profitability than with his family's health, he replied: 'I don't think even in those circumstances I would want to put my company in a difficult position'. You might prefer Mr Burt: 'Too many companies and businesses demand outrageous time commitments from those who work for them, without thought of the damage to family structure or for the strength their employees should get from a sound family life.' Third bonus question: Does this Government have a coherent policy on anything? Perhaps Mr Blair can help. It is time to rescue the family from the faltering, sanctimonious grasp of those who fail to understand its precious ability to teach obligation with love.
(Photographs omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments