Leading Article: No such thing as a free source of energy

Sunday 27 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GENERATING electricity from the wind seems magical, conjuring pollution-free power from nature. For centuries windmills pumped water or ground corn for our ancestors. Now their hi-tech successors, elegant towers with sweeping sails that turn to the gentle rhythm of the countryside, are - supposedly - saving us from the consequences of our voracious energy demands. And so this new generation of wind turbines has been granted some of Britain's most prominent sites to turn the idle breeze into usable power.

Yet the reality has been far from idyllic. Modern windmills - huge propellers on high towers - are being built in 'farms'. Scores of turbines per site have sprouted across the country in a couple of years. People in Cornwall and Yorkshire are shocked by these intruders on the unspoilt landscape which, for all their cleanness, are more visually obtrusive than nuclear power stations. Thanks to government subsidies, there has been a gold rush to create such farms. Hundreds of potential sites have been identified.

Nuclear power was initially regarded as a clean and cheap fuel, but disillusionment set in long before Chernobyl. Hydroelectric dams were originally seen as environmentally good: damage to the flood plains of the Nile valley and the displacement of African tribal peoples by the Kariba dam corrected that view. Even tidal barrages, as proposed for the Severn and Mersey estuaries, will harm wildlife that depends for food on mud flats. Now it has been recognised that the wind is not free.

Like the proliferation of roads, the extension of suburbia and the construction of industrial parks, the march of wind turbines across rural areas threatens to overwhelm the untouched beauties of Britain. There are appropriate sites for such developments, remote from houses and appealing landscapes, that would not cause such damage. The Government should identify these instead of allowing despoilation to take place on an ad hoc basis, and should explore offshore windmills which, though expensive, would catch the strongest winds and be the least unsightly.

The massed ranks of windmills that might soon be seen from Hadrian's Wall should persuade the doubters that all energy imposes costs somewhere. That should convince everyone to lag that boiler and switch off a few more lights.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in