Leading Article: Lifting the bonnet on mechanical failure

Wednesday 06 October 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE SURVEY of garage servicing published by Which? yesterday will confirm what most people already know: that many people who run garages are either incompetent or dishonest, or both. There can be no other explanation for the litany of errors and omissions that the Consumers' Association inspectors found when they sent 36 cars in for service incognito. The interesting question is why standards should be so low, when more than 11,000 garages compete for business.

Trading standards departments in local councils are manifestly failing in their duty to protect the consumer. They should perform more unannounced inspections and act more vigorously on the rising tide of complaints - an average of almost 1.7 for every garage per year. Notices might be posted in garage receptions and offices to tell angry customers where to go for satisfaction. But the scale of the problem is too great to be blamed on lax inspection alone.

It is in the nature of car mechanics' business that few customers can tell the difference between a good and a bad job. Barbers, house-painters and journalists, whose lapses can be immediately visible, have no such luxury. The large number of customers who have their servicing bills paid by their employers are often less vigilant than they might be.

The other factor at work is the broader decline in educational standards. You may not need a PhD to repair a car, but you need mechanical knowledge, manual dexterity and a certain problem-solving aptitude for identifying the link between the way a car sounds when it is driven and the reality of what is going on beneath its bonnet. Badly trained, semi-literate, semi-numerate people, of whom too many have been turned out of British schools over the past decade, have little hope of becoming skilled mechanics.

As for the future, the bad news is that cars are continuing to get more complex and electronic, so home servicing is becoming a more remote option for the amateur enthusiast. The good news is that cars are also becoming more reliable and better- made, so many drivers need to visit a garage only once every 12,000 miles. Car manufacturers are belatedly doing their bit to help. So seriously do they take customers' concerns about maintenance, that a growing number are offering guarantees on the new cars they sell - not just money- back-after-14-days-if-not-satisfied, but also proper guarantees under which the manufacturer will make good at its own expense any defects that emerge within the first three (or more) years of a car's life. Unfortunately, such promises come too late for the owners of cars already on the road - or in the garage.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in