Leading Article: History as seen from Tokyo

Sunday 21 March 1993 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CRITICS of France's highly centralised school system used to joke that the education minister in Paris could look at his watch and say with certainty which subject every 11-year-old in the country was studying at that moment. In Tokyo today, they go further: the minister can even say which books the pupils are reading. Japan has a system of central control of school textbooks that sits uneasily in a free society. It has just been upheld by its Supreme Court.

In theory, school books are not censored in Japan. Rather they are 'screened': advisers to the education ministry go through drafts of forthcoming textbooks and 'suggest' amendments to them. Until recently the system was secret and the bureaucrats were free to demand hundreds of changes. Publishers have always obeyed. They know that a book lacking the stamp of bureaucratic approval will never reach the country's schools. This system has had a pernicious effect on two generations of Japanese. Specifically, the reluctance of the ministry's senior officials to face what Japan did in Asia before and during the Second World War has resulted in a bizarre teaching of the country's modern history. The causes of the war and the details of its waging have been left vague; only the agony of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain in sharp focus. As a result, an alarming number of Japanese under 30 know little about the Pacific war, and some do not even know which country started it. It is no wonder, then, that young Japanese tourists are puzzled to be treated with hostility when they visit the Asian countries that their grandfathers invaded.

Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court in Tokyo upheld a lower court ruling denying compensation to a professor whose soul-searching New Japanese History the ministry rejected outright in 1962. Thanks to the absurd slowness of Japanese legal process, the case is now almost moot; the author is 79, and the most instructive bits of Japan's modern history have happened since his book was published. But the Court upholds the controversial screenings, and the only succour it gives to reformers is to say that the changes demanded by the bureaucrats must be 'reasonable'.

That sends the wrong signal to Japan's people, and to countries once its vassals and now its neighbours. It reinforces the impression that Japan is loath to face up to its record of atrocities before and during the Second World War. And it goes against the tide inside Japanese education itself, which is belatedly giving more scope to individuality and self-expression. There is much to be admired in Japanese schooling. The Supreme Court's ruling ensures that a serious weakness remains unremedied.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in