Leading Article: Final credits for a telly addict
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AN AMIABLE, jolly, mumsy, pernicious, bigoted, publicity-seeking, silly, grey-haired old thing. So farewell, Mary Whitehouse, after 30 years of campaigning for less sex and violence on television. The director of private prosecutions (as she was once called) is ending her self-appointed watch. Some broadcasters welcome her departure, others treat it with studied indifference. 'I don't think she has had any effect at all,' said Michael Grade.
Yet, lately, Mrs Whitehouse has become almost fashionable. Even the most liberal linen suits are a little fatigued with the youthful ya-boo excesses of programmes like Mr Grade's The Word; to suggest, in the wake of the James Bulger trial and Professor Elizabeth Newson's recent report, that violent videos affect behaviour is no longer to invite automatic ejection from where chatterers gather. The old bat, the feeling now goes, may well have had a point all these years.
She did. But there is a lazy and arrogant assumption of a monopoly on right-thinking among our broadcasters which does not take particularly kindly to lectures from stridently-Christian non-graduate middle-aged women. Sir Hugh Carleton-Greene, the great liberalising BBC director-general, ordained that her views were of no importance and that she should not be interviewed. A more sensible view comes from Bill Cotton, one of his executives: 'She reminded you that part of your audience resented what you were doing in their living rooms.'
A point, though, with bad flaws. She must take a large responsibility for the curious association of sex and violence as activities equally to be deplored. She always seemed unable to allow any artistic purpose or justification. For Mary, heaving buttocks were always going to be heaving buttocks. But she did, in the face of any amount of sneers - and almost singlehandedly in the Sixties - keep an entertaining and important debate going. Thank you, Mary. Now turn it off and read a good book instead.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments