Leading Article: Death in the afternoon

Wednesday 04 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SAO PAOLO's traffic came to a halt yesterday as thousands of Brazilians came on to the streets to grieve as the coffin carrying Ayrton Senna came home. On the other side of the world, in Paris, motor sport's governing body, the FIA, issued its first response to the appalling events at Imola last weekend, which culminated in Senna's fatal 180mph crash.

Although motor racing is inherently dangerous, the accident that claimed Ayrton Senna's life was profoundly shocking. This is partly because safety has improved exponentially in recent years. The last time a driver was killed in a grand prix was 12 years ago. We have become used to spectacular crashes from which drivers have walked almost casually away. But the other reason why Senna's death was so shocking was because it was Senna. It is difficult to think of any sportsman who performs as consistently close to perfection. If anybody was going to be killed on the race track, it was not Senna.

It is this sense of disbelief, compounded by Roland Ratzenberger's fatal crash on Saturday, which has led to a frantic search for explanations and new safety measures. The explanation for what happened may, however, be the simplest. After failing to score in the first two races of the season, Senna was expected to win easily at Imola, a power circuit which should have favoured his Williams-Renault. He must have been surprised to find Michael Schumacher's Benetton- Ford pushing him hard. Under great pressure, he may just have made a mistake. As to safety measures, there are none that would with certainty have prevented his death. Three measures might, however, have saved him. The first is a cockpit airbag of the kind recommended yesterday by the FIA. The second is longer run-off areas and gravel traps at high-speed corners. The third is a substantial reduction in the cornering powers of the cars. With luck, grand prix will go at least another 12 years without a death on the track. But, as Ayrton Senna would have been the first to acknowledge, risks can be reduced but not eliminated.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in