Leading Article: BBC risks contempt of Parliament
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT'S TIME to put the brakes on James Boyle. Mr Boyle, controller of BBC Radio 4, apparently thinks Yesterday in Parliament is "boring" and should instantly be shunted off to the long-wave frequency. This is one of a series of changes in parliamentary and political programming, which also includes moving the half hour Week in Westminster from Saturday morning to a graveyard slot on Thursday evening, when only the most devoted politics junkies are likely to tune in.
The first problem with this strategy - which has greatly upset MPs - is that it is not borne out by the facts. Yesterday in Parliament attracts an audience of 1.3 million, while according to a BBC spokesman The Week in Westminster is listened to by 658,000 people on a Saturday morning. Will Wyatt, chief executive of BBC Broadcasting, and Matthew Bannister, managing director of BBC Radio Network, irritated MPs on Thursday by being unable to give figures for the drop when the late night Today in Parliament went to long wave from FM. The audience more than halved, to around 160,000. And research carried out by the rival BBC News Directorate showed that listeners feel very warmly about both Yesterday in Parliament and The Week in Westminster. Which is not surprising. Both programmes, have an appeal which makes casual listeners stay with them once they have happened upon them.
The BBC has mishandled these changes, and not only by failing to convince MPs. It's far from certain that Mr Boyle would attract a bigger audience by getting rid of the parliamentary programmes he regards as being in the way. But whether he would or not, the BBC has a public service remit. In an age of spin and pre-packaged political announcements, Parliament remains the one theatre in which the executive is publicly and daily called to account, however imperfectly. The point of these programmes is that they are enjoyed by a surprisingly sizeable audience - more than half of whom would not hunt for them on another channel but enjoy them if they don't have to. If covering Parliament with programming that holds its listeners isn't part of the BBC's remit, it's difficult to see what is.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments