Leading Article: A thin line Tories must not overstep

Sunday 09 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Prime Minister's attempt yesterday to defend his back to basics campaign amid further revelations of the moral fallibility of Tory MPs served only to emphasise his own weakness - and his government's shortsightedness in presenting itself as the promoter of core values.

John Major was speaking to Sir David Frost on breakfast TV even as viewers absorbed three fresh disclosures: that Tim Yeo, the former environment minister, had fathered a second child out of wedlock while at Cambridge; that a wealthy Tory MP, Alan Duncan, had bought a Westminster neighbour's ex-council house on the cheap; and, more farcically, that a Tory MP was being accused by his wife of having gone off with another man.

In his interview, the Prime Minister sought to draw a distinction between people who 'patently behave badly' and those who 'commit an indiscretion'. It was perfectly proper, he said, that the former should not remain in a public position; but for those who behaved foolishly, tolerance and understanding might be extended.

The idea that such a distinction can be drawn reeks of the hypocrisy that has marked this chapter in the Conservative Party's history. Tory MPs who in future take the risk of sleeping with someone who is not their spouse may wonder whether what they are doing amounts to patent bad behaviour or mere

indiscretion. The answer would doubtless hinge on the effectiveness of their contraceptive precautions: as Mr Yeo's experience showed, to father a baby in the course of an affair is to draw attention to infidelity.

Mr Major protests in vain that he is 'not in the business of a witch- hunt against people who behave in a foolish fashion'. The fact is that too many prominent Tories have been found recently to be behaving in ways sharply at odds with the high moralising tone adopted at last year's Blackpool conference. The Government as a whole thus stands accused of collective hypocrisy, of preaching one thing while its members do another.

The private lives of all Tory MPs and ministers, but especially of those adopting a high moral tone, have therefore become a legitimate target for press interest. The Sun has even installed a 'Humbug Hotline' ('Have you had a bellyful of hypocrites? Is your MP hiding something, saying one thing while doing another?'). The Tories' strategic error has been compounded by Mr Major's failure to decide for himself Mr Yeo's fate as a minister. In allowing constituency activists to take the decision, he effectively put his entire ministerial team at risk from moral zealots.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in