Leading Article: A concept killed by extremist advocates

Thursday 20 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE CASE of the Hackney headteacher who rejected an opportunity for her pupils to see the ballet Romeo and Juliet at the Royal Opera House because it did not 'explore the full extent of human sexuality' is a classic example of how the politically correct movement has become a gift to the political right. It is one of those cases of the backlash becoming more powerful than the idea that precipitated it.

The concept of political correctness seems first to have emerged in Sixties America as a well-intentioned attempt by leftish liberals to discourage the use of words that gave offence on grounds of gender, sexuality, race or disability. It took root most firmly in the educational sphere. There it led to pressure for curriculums that, for example, viewed history more from the perspective of ethnic minorities. It overlapped heavily with feminism and, to a lesser extent, with the movement for positive discrimination in favour of minority groups.

To the delight of the political right, it soon laid itself open to derision by attempts to propagate a series of ludicrous euphemisms, such as calling the disabled 'differently abled' or the short 'vertically challenged' - though it was never easy to know which had been dreamt up by humourless ideologues and which by satirical detractors. No less welcome to the right were the PC-mongers' attempts to correct what they saw as an educational bias in favour of Dead White European Males (Dwems), presumably including Shakespeare; and their tendency to espouse the homosexual cause.

What had started as a movement to eliminate the offensive use of words such as cripple and spastic, and to sharpen awareness of gender bias in such words as mankind, soon lent itself to portrayal as a new brand of censorship and thought- policing. The backlash has been effective: the abjectness of the headteacher's apology yesterday was a measure of her misreading of the present mood.

The biggest failing of the PC movement has been its complete lack of any sense of humour and proportion. Where feminism has survived its own extremists, the PC movement has died of derision even before establishing itself in this country. The Hackney headteacher is just another of those who helped to kill an essentially sound idea.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in