Lawyers welcome the Woolf report: Letter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (27 July), on Lord Woolf's final report, did lawyers and the Law Society a serious injustice.
Both the Law Society and the Bar Council and very many individual lawyers from both professions have provided considerable support to Lord Woolf and his team in the last two years and have welcomed the main thrust of his proposals.
The profession knows very well that the interests of clients must come first and that changes which will make access to the civil justice system easier and achieve results in cases more quickly and cheaply, are both necessary and to be welcomed.
Many firms of solicitors are already operating in a streamlined, client- oriented way in their litigation practices and many, too, are encouraging clients in appropriate cases to use mediation, arbitration, ombudsmen and other ADR routes to settle their disputes.
Lord Woolf is particularly concerned to enable ordinary citizens and small businesses to have an affordable, speedy and fair chance of pursuing or defending a claim, even against well-resourced opponents. The system of fixed costs on the fast track could play a major part in achieving this, provided those fixed costs are set at a fair and workable level, after proper piloting and testing of the new procedures.
If Lord Woolf is right and much of the fear of litigation, especially exposure to uncertain costs, is removed, his reforms could well produce more work for lawyers. This is already happening in personal injury and insolvency work, following the introduction of conditional fees a year ago. In Germany, where a fixed costs system has been operating for many years and many citizens have legal expenses insurance, the amount of litigation per head is seven times that of this country.
Solicitors should view the new post-Woolf litigation landscape positively as an opportunity to offer clients a better service.
TONY GIRLING
President
The Law Society
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments