Last chance for asylum seekers: Letter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Today peers have one last chance to decide whether it is right to remove all means of subsistence from asylum seekers who flee repressive regimes in fear of their lives and freedom to seek a safe haven in Britain.
Citizens' Advice Bureaux know that fear, ignorance of procedures, natural anxiety and disorientation are among the many reasons why genuine asylum seekers may not apply for refugee status as soon as they set foot in this country. CAB have also seen at first hand the extent of the hardship caused by the withdrawal of benefits from asylum seekers in February. One London CAB, for instance, reported the case of an Iraqi couple with two small children. The man had been imprisoned in Iraq for political activity, but the family was refused all benefits because they sought asylum not at their port of entry, but later the same day at the Home Office department in Croydon. They had nothing to live on until the CAB helped get them pounds 55 a week in emergency payments from the local authority under the Children Act.
The new Lords' amendment simply provides the minimum protection that is acceptable in a civilised society. Should it fail, many genuine asylum seekers will be put at grave risk. It is to be hoped that once again peers will stand up for basic human rights in what is essentially a test of our common humanity as a nation.
ANN ABRAHAM
National Association of Citizens' Advice Bureaux
London N1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments