US Military: one year out and proud

 

Monday 17 September 2012 05:49 EDT
Comments
Joseph Martinez, an active duty sailor in the Navy, prepares to march during the San Diego gay pride parade July 16, 2011
Joseph Martinez, an active duty sailor in the Navy, prepares to march during the San Diego gay pride parade July 16, 2011 (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It's almost a year since the US military repealed "don't ask, don't tell" - and a New York Times editorial argues that reformists were correct on all fronts.

A detailed report on the impact of repeal states that there has been "no overall negative impact on military readiness or its component dimensions, including cohesion, recruitment, retention, assaults, harassment or morale.” While a small number of servicemen are uncomfortable with the new policy of openness, the "morale of some gay and straight service members appears to have improved significantly."

The report's authors, however, did not address how the "cruel and unconstitutional" Defence of Marriage Act affected homosexual troop members; the bill, introduced in 1996, denies legally married couples of the same-sex access to the same federal benefits their heterosexual peers receive.

For troops this means "same-sex spouses are denied important military benefits, like discounted housing, surviving spouse benefits, treatment in military medical facilities, and medical and dental insurance." And the NYT editorial concludes that "all of this disrespects the service and the sacrifice of gay and lesbian troops, as well as the core military values of equality."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in