Nevermind the Rotterdam heist, real-life thieves aren't glamorous
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Forget Cary Grant in To Catch a Thief, and Michael Caine in Gambit. According to Anthony M. Amore in The New York Times, the criminals who steal priceless works of art in real life aren't even as glamorous as an aging Pierce Brosnan in the 1999 remake of The Thomas Crown Affair.
"Most of us envision balaclava-clad cat burglars rappelling through skylights into museums and, like Hollywood characters, contorting their bodies around motion-detecting laser beams," he writes. "Instead, they are the same crooks who rob armored cars for cash, pharmacies for drugs and homes for jewelry. They are often opportunistic and almost always shortsighted."
The extreme difficulty of fencing a famous masterpiece, means that those who do fancy the risk, likely only do so once and without much thought, argues Amore. Yet again, it seems the movies are better than real life.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments