Black Republicans are only ‘tokens’ of progress

 

Wednesday 19 December 2012 12:10 EST
Comments
Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain
Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Did you know that Representative Tim Scott will be the first black Republican senator since 1979? Well, that's a fact. But what's far less clear is what his appointment says about the racial attitudes of the GOP, according to Adolph Reed in the New York Times.

Reed says: "this “first black” rhetoric tends to interpret African-American political successes — including that of President Obama — as part of a morality play that dramatizes 'how far we have come.' It obscures the fact that modern black Republicans have been more tokens than signs of progress."

He adds that, since most of Mr Scott's politics are "utterly at odds with the preferences of most black Americans" (being anti-tax, anti-abortion and anti-union), there's really no sign that the Republicans are listening to the concerns of America's ethnic minorities. (Who, as we've discussed on IV before, can hardly be thought of as minorities anymore.)

So this appointment, according to Reed, is far more a ploy to draw white voters back to voting Republican - allaying fears that to do so is a "racist" decision.

What do you think, is this a step forwards for the Republicans, or are they plastering over a whitewash?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in