As Senator Rand Paul completes a 6-hour speech, are filibusters democratic heroes?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If you've ever seen the 1939 classic, Mr Smith Goes To Washington, you'll know what a filibuster is. The parliamentary procedure, where a member attempts to "talk out" a bill by giving a speech so long it delays the vote has been practiced since Ancient Rome, when senator Cato the Younger was notorious for blocking legislation by speaking until dusk, at which point Senate rules required all business to be concluded.
The latest practitioner of the move is US Republican senator Rand Paul who yesterday delayed Obama's CIA nomination with a six-hour speech in protest against drones. "I will speak until I can no longer speak," Paul said, and so he did.
The UK Parliament also has a long tradition of fillibustering. In 1983, Labour MP John Golding managed 11 hours (with breaks to eat), in an attempt to delay a vote on the British Telecommunications Bill. Paul's speech matches the all-time Commons record for non-stop speaking, set by Henry Brougham in 1828, although since that speech was not actually for filibustering purposes, presumably Brougham was just a windbag.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments