Letter from the editor: Isis is thriving because of the military and moral exhaustion of the West
To say we helped to create Isis is not to rationalise its savagery, or to indulge in the self-loathing that has crippled Western self-confidence since 9/11. It’s just a matter of fact
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.You could call it the curse of the Editor – except I certainly wasn’t the only one caught out. Last week this column opened with the ludicrous words “Not a great week for Isis, then”. Which was rather, erm, overtaken by events when it turned out that they were responsible for the worst terror attack in modern European history.
I was referring to the retaking of Sinjar by Kurdish Peshmerga forces, and the death by air strike of Mohammed Emwazi, also known as Jihadi John. Setbacks they might have been; but the horror in Paris rendered my judgement out of date.
It will strike some readers as crude to turn such events into a journalistic competition, but I have been exceptionally proud of our coverage on the ground in France and Belgium. When such huge news events break, the instinct of every reporter is to get to the scene as quickly as possible, establish the facts, and speak to those involved or nearby. Of course, you need the deeper analysis of intelligence and security failures, and wider geopolitics; but nothing beats being at the scene. For their bravery and nous, Leo Cendrowicz, Alistair Dawber, Chris Green, Adam Lusher, Kim Sengupta, Cahal Milmo and, of course, our man in Paris, John Lichfield, deserve thanks and credit.
Yesterday’s events in Mali showed that Islamist terror is spreading its tentacles far and wide. For the past few centuries, wars have been fought mostly between states, or empires, or ideological blocks (as in the Cold War). This is a fight between civilisation and terror – making the enemy harder to identify, and victory both harder to achieve and define. That doesn’t mean, however, that we can or should choose not to fight. That was the gist of our editorial following the massacre in Paris (“It’s war… but not as we know it”).
To say we helped to create Isis is not to rationalise its savagery, or to indulge in the self-loathing that has crippled Western self-confidence since 9/11. It’s just a matter of fact. The top command of Isis is dominated by former officers from Saddam’s military and intelligence agencies. And one reason the group has flourished, aside from persecution by Bashar al-Assad, is because of the moral and military exhaustion of the West, brought on by its counter-productive, murderous invasion of Iraq. I’m proud that this newspaper led the opposition to that war, with arguments that get righter by the day.
On Thursday, Andrew Neil explained why we will win this war – because our values are superior – in a diatribe that went viral. It was an optimistic message at a grim time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments